Drawings, dollars, and the decisions between them.
Questions about construction software coverage, corrections, or suggestions for what we should look at next all reach us through this page.
Contact Cmigolabe Agent
Write to the editors.
We read everything that comes in, though we can’t always reply right away. If your message is about a specific page, mention it; that speeds things up.
- Corrections. Send the page, the exact statement, and what you believe is accurate. Corrections with citations move faster.
- Coverage suggestions. Tell us which platform or workflow is missing and what distinct approach it represents.
- Workflow questions. Retainage across multiple active jobs, commitment tracking, change-order routing — we cover them in future pages when they keep coming up.
Prefer to stay anonymous? Say so in the note. We honour requests to stay anonymous and we credit readers who prefer to be credited.
Review the privacy policyWhat to write to us about
The useful messages.
The most useful messages tend to be corrections and additions. If a platform’s capabilities have changed since we last wrote about it, or if a comparison we cited no longer reflects the market, tell us what changed.
What we can help with
- Corrections to a specific statement on a page you have used in practice.
- Capabilities of the eight platforms we cover that have changed since we wrote about them.
- Workflow questions you think deserve a page of their own — like retainage across multiple active jobs.
- Suggestions for a platform that adds a distinct approach to the set we already cover.
What we can’t do
- We don’t provide software selection consulting.
- We don’t make introductions to vendors.
- We don’t advise on specific contracts or financial disputes.
- Our role is educational. If you need hands-on help choosing or implementing software, a consultant or an implementation partner is the right resource.
Software decisions in construction rarely fail on features and often fail on rollout — which is why implementation support exists as its own occupation, and why we keep editorial distance from it.
Corrections and accuracy
Stale coverage is worse than no coverage.
Construction software changes slowly, but it does change. Features get added, pricing tiers get restructured, vendors get acquired. When we miss one of those updates, the page goes stale. Here is how a correction moves through the desk.
-
Your note arrives
Include the page and the specific statement
A correction is easiest to act on when it names the page, quotes the sentence we wrote, and then says what you believe is accurate. Vague “this is out of date” messages cost us most of the time a specific one would not.
-
We verify
Against public sources
Before any wording on a page changes, we check the claim against vendor documentation, release notes, or a public pricing page. We do not print corrections we cannot source — ours or yours.
-
We update the page
And credit you, if you want
The page is revised in place. We credit readers who prefer to be credited; we also honour requests to stay anonymous. Both are fine, and the choice is entirely yours.
How to reach us directly
One address, one phone, one inbox.
If you prefer written contact, use the form on this page, and note whether you’d like a reply or would rather we simply incorporate a correction without responding. Both are fine.
Office
Cmicgolabe Agent
1201 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 400
Atlanta, GA 30361, USA
Phone
Hours
Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Messages are reviewed in the order they arrive, and we aim to respond within a few business days. If you haven’t heard back in a week, resending is fine — occasionally messages get filtered, and we’d rather see yours twice than not at all.
The Cmigolabe Agent editorial desk is in Midtown Atlanta. We are a resource, not a vendor showroom — visits are by appointment.
Suggestions for coverage
Why one platform and not another.
We’re sometimes asked why we cover one construction management platform and not another. The answer usually comes down to whether the platform adds a distinct approach to the set we already cover. If you believe we’re missing a platform that would, say so and explain what makes it different — the specific workflow it handles better, the trade it serves, the approach our current eight don’t represent.
The same goes for workflows: if there’s a term or process we haven’t explained and it keeps coming up in contractor conversations — commitment tracking at the subcontract level, change-order routing when the owner is also the CM, how retainage behaves across multiple concurrent jobs — it probably belongs on the site. That is how most of our coverage pages began.
Questions we get
Three honest answers.
If yours isn’t here, the form above is the shortest route to the desk.
Will you recommend a specific software vendor?
No. We explain the platforms and the workflows; the fit decision stays with you. If you need a recommendation, an independent consultant who knows your operation is a better resource.
How long until I hear back?
Usually within a few business days. Corrections with specific citations tend to move faster. If a week passes and you haven’t heard, resending is fine.
Can I request coverage of a platform not on your list?
Yes. Tell us why it deserves a place, specifically what approach it represents that our current eight don’t cover, and we’ll consider it.
We’d rather see your note twice than not at all.
If your correction is factual, please do send it. If it’s a suggestion for a platform or a workflow we haven’t covered, send it too. And if you’ve read something on About and want to know the method behind a page, that belongs here as well.